
Louis XIV (1638–1715), by Charles Le Brun
On July 18, 1668 in the gardens of Versailles, Louis XIV threw quite a fête for himself to celebrate his military victories. "Le Grand Divertissement royal," it was called, and cost one-third the yearly budget of Versailles. Royal parties were expensive. So Louis raised taxes -- relying heavily on the peasants -- and forced prosperous towns to pay homage of huge sums.
The Sun King was well known for his opulent extravagance. This is best exemplified by the construction of his palace at Versailles, his Hall of Mirrors and over the top baroque furnishings. Louis' motivation was not based just on his eye for luxury, but it was also a way of controlling the nobility, reducing their power and keeping a sharp eye for any potential rivals. Louis was flattered by all as much as he was feared. He insisted on his particular daily rituals, the Levee and the Coucher. Around 8:30 am the king, resting in his bed, would hear: “It is time, Sire”. The levee was a ceremonial rising just for him. Doctors, family and a few favored friends entered the king's bedroom where he was washed, combed, shaven and dressed. Then he slurped down a breakfast of broth with everyone standing around. It was estimated the attendants numbered one hundred, all male. At 11:30 pm, The Coucher, was performed -- a reverse, shortened version of the levee to celebrate Louis retiring to bed.
On July 18, 1668 in the gardens of Versailles, Louis XIV threw quite a fête for himself to celebrate his military victories. "Le Grand Divertissement royal," it was called, and cost one-third the yearly budget of Versailles. Royal parties were expensive. So Louis raised taxes -- relying heavily on the peasants -- and forced prosperous towns to pay homage of huge sums.
The Sun King was well known for his opulent extravagance. This is best exemplified by the construction of his palace at Versailles, his Hall of Mirrors and over the top baroque furnishings. Louis' motivation was not based just on his eye for luxury, but it was also a way of controlling the nobility, reducing their power and keeping a sharp eye for any potential rivals. Louis was flattered by all as much as he was feared. He insisted on his particular daily rituals, the Levee and the Coucher. Around 8:30 am the king, resting in his bed, would hear: “It is time, Sire”. The levee was a ceremonial rising just for him. Doctors, family and a few favored friends entered the king's bedroom where he was washed, combed, shaven and dressed. Then he slurped down a breakfast of broth with everyone standing around. It was estimated the attendants numbered one hundred, all male. At 11:30 pm, The Coucher, was performed -- a reverse, shortened version of the levee to celebrate Louis retiring to bed.
Skip to nearly four-and-a-half centuries later in America and I can’t help to see some similarities. John Thain’s task last year was to oversee the sale of Merrill Lynch to Bank of America Corporation and take over the bank's wealth management and corporate and investment banking divisions. He had to reduce expenses and fix the security firm. In order to get his wits about him, he needed to spend $1.2 million of the bank's money to lavishly redecorate his Merrill Lynch office while major layoffs were looming and the firm was going down in flames.
Thain hired (the fabulous) Michael Smith for $800,000 to create an environment where he could adequately think about this mess. Smith procured two area rugs for a total of $131,000, two guest chairs for $87,000, a nineteenth-century sideboard (mistakenly called a ‘credenza’) for $68,000, four pairs of drapes at $28,000, Roman shades for $11,000, a mahogany pedestal table at $25,000, a George IV Desk for $18,000, a sofa for $15,000; a custom coffee table for $16,000; Regency Chairs for $24,000 (personally, I question if they were period and designers out there: is this appropriate for a commercial application?); 40 yards of fabric for wall panels for $5,000, six wall sconces for $2,700, and a parchment covered trash can for $1,400.
In his private dining room he ordered six chairs for $37,000, a mirror for $5,000, and a chandelier for $13,000. And lastly, a $35,000 "commode on legs." (I assume this means a toilet and not a French dresser.)
Thain hired (the fabulous) Michael Smith for $800,000 to create an environment where he could adequately think about this mess. Smith procured two area rugs for a total of $131,000, two guest chairs for $87,000, a nineteenth-century sideboard (mistakenly called a ‘credenza’) for $68,000, four pairs of drapes at $28,000, Roman shades for $11,000, a mahogany pedestal table at $25,000, a George IV Desk for $18,000, a sofa for $15,000; a custom coffee table for $16,000; Regency Chairs for $24,000 (personally, I question if they were period and designers out there: is this appropriate for a commercial application?); 40 yards of fabric for wall panels for $5,000, six wall sconces for $2,700, and a parchment covered trash can for $1,400.
In his private dining room he ordered six chairs for $37,000, a mirror for $5,000, and a chandelier for $13,000. And lastly, a $35,000 "commode on legs." (I assume this means a toilet and not a French dresser.)
Thain signed off on the purchases, as well as, "Labor to relamp the six wall sconces" for $3,000, and another payment of $30,000 to pay additional expenses Smith had incurred.
Michael Smith is being paid $100,000 to redecorate for the Obamas, which includes items from Target. (According to The Daily Beast), by the way.

We live in a society where an outrageous level of compensation is a justifiable reward for executives. Apparently, this level of extravagance is standard operating behavior. And apparently, high-profile CEO’s have the power, magnitude and all the glory of kings.
Are the rest of us mere peasants? According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics the national average salary is a little over $40,000, or in other words, approximately one thirtieth of Thain's expenses for the redecoration of his office.
Bank of America received $25 billion in bailout funds and then an additional $20 billion mid January while Thain spent $1.2 million to have his office redecorated out of the profits of the company as previous employers he axed were out of work. Merrill Lynch lost $56 billion from sub prime loans and the credit crisis, so what’s another $1.2 million, eh John? As Marie-Antoinette allegedly uttered a century later, “Let them eat cake?” – and we all know what happened to her.
Hey Thain, what principles were this great country founded upon?
(Thain resigned at the end of last month after being found out and has vowed to repay the funds. Must be a drop in the ocean from his end-of-the-year bonus.)
Are the rest of us mere peasants? According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics the national average salary is a little over $40,000, or in other words, approximately one thirtieth of Thain's expenses for the redecoration of his office.
Bank of America received $25 billion in bailout funds and then an additional $20 billion mid January while Thain spent $1.2 million to have his office redecorated out of the profits of the company as previous employers he axed were out of work. Merrill Lynch lost $56 billion from sub prime loans and the credit crisis, so what’s another $1.2 million, eh John? As Marie-Antoinette allegedly uttered a century later, “Let them eat cake?” – and we all know what happened to her.
Hey Thain, what principles were this great country founded upon?
(Thain resigned at the end of last month after being found out and has vowed to repay the funds. Must be a drop in the ocean from his end-of-the-year bonus.)


11 comments:
I agree with you. Some of the stories emerging about bonuses and this one about Thain's extravagance beggar belief. It seems too that the news of these is only slowly dripping out.
Prior to the financial collapse I thought the salaries and bonuses being paid to the so-called high flyers were totally obscene, and disproportionate in a publicly listed company - which clearly gave some incentive to take risks that would be totally unacceptable.
The chickens have come home to roost on that score.
Great post - such outrageousness should not be left unspoken. xv
Soodie, I love your comment "to get his wits about him" about Thain! The situations lik this are truly outrageous.
Very well said!
ha ha -- this was clever soodie. both louis and thain lived and ruled as kings -- louis reigned his whole life time, thain reigned 13 months. both made decisions to "lavishly decorate" both on the backs of the working people who paid for it -- thain's narcissiam disgusts me
Hi all. Thank you for such great comments. Last week I sort of got into it with someone about Thain. She said you have to buck up for talent to get it. But this is outrageous. Think of all the incredible teachers who get paid crap, the social workers, the artists, the designers... the list is immense. These jobs are not easy. There are NO material benefits. All of this just does not seem right. As we know, life is by no means fair, but at this point everything seems so wrong. This type of insanity, i think, fuels people to cheat on taxes, lie to their insurance companies (believe me, I've recently been working on a number of cases in this area), steal from their parents once they've been stuffed into an assisted living facility and forgotten (another one I'm working on), AND pay talented designer/artists/writers very little as corporations reap most of their earnings. Also, what I've found is that people (especially the younger generation just starting out in the working world) associate 'respect' with high paying jobs. There has been a perceived loss of integrity for those not making bank and they are not measured by the quality work that they do. Thain was being paid how much for being an idiot? Where is the code of ethics he has to adhere to? What about a responsibility to the members of the bank? If he knew his history, perhaps, he would stop to think about the repercussions of greed we see time and time again throughout the centuries. Just burns me to no end. And this is NOT an isolated incident.
Please let me know if any of you view this differently. I would like to know to try to understand this.
wow I think you nailed it soodie--greed and entitlement is what comes to my mind--somehow john thain thought he lay claim to the perks and money--then seized it-- that is fraud--entitlements are guaranteed benefits like social security we working people pay into--or medicaid that was fought for in congress to protect and help the poor with health care
ok my last comment on this subject--this is from MoveOn a political group--
"Last Friday, Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill took to the Senate floor and said what I imagine a lot of us have been thinking about Wall Street lately:
"They don't get it. These people are idiots. You can't use taxpayer money to pay out $18 billion in bonuses...What planet are these people on?"
wow I think you nailed it soodie--greed and entitlement is what comes to my mind--somehow john thain thought he lay claim to the perks and money--then seized it-- that is fraud--entitlements are guaranteed benefits like social security we working people pay into--or medicaid that was fought for in congress to protect and help the poor with health care
ok my last comment on this subject--this is from MoveOn a political group--
"Last Friday, Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill took to the Senate floor and said what I imagine a lot of us have been thinking about Wall Street lately:
"They don't get it. These people are idiots. You can't use taxpayer money to pay out $18 billion in bonuses...What planet are these people on?"
I've added another chapter to this story in my blog today, and linked it to yours.
Post a Comment